What Moves Like TIGO

Millicom International Cellular S.A. Radiotelephone Communications · Nasdaq

The tradable tickers whose daily moves track TIGO most closely over the past year, filtered to risk comparable with TIGO's own.

Closest match

ATNI ATN International, Inc. — 0.380 correlation over the past year, and 33% choppier than TIGO.

251 sessions to 2026-09-10 · TIGO volatility 40.4% annualised · $122.3M a day
Ticker 1-year correlation 3-year Volatility vs TIGO Risk What it is
ATNI ATN International, Inc.
0.380
0.226 1.33× 33% choppier Telephone Communications (No Radiotelephone)
TIMB TIM S.A. American Preferred
0.356
0.292 0.80× 20% calmer Telephone Communications (No Radiotelephone)
INSM Insmed Incorporated
0.350
0.181 1.54× 54% choppier Pharmaceutical Preparations
VIV Telefonica Brasil S.A. American Preferred
0.346
0.274 0.75× 25% calmer Telephone Communications (No Radiotelephone)
UGP Ultrapar Participacoes S.A. (New) American Preferred
0.344
0.280 0.86× 14% calmer Natural GAS Distribution
ITUB Itau Unibanco Banco Holding SA American Preferred
0.344
0.329 0.79× 22% calmer State Commercial Banks
EWZS iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
0.341
0.334 0.77× 23% calmer Fund
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
0.336
0.324 0.63× 37% calmer Fund
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
0.332
0.334 0.63× 38% calmer Fund
BAP Credicorp Ltd.
0.325
0.272 0.86× 14% calmer Commercial Banks, Nec
STNE StoneCo Ltd. - Class A Common Share
0.315
0.263 1.22× 22% choppier Services-Computer Processing & Data Preparation
BBD Banco Bradesco Sa American Depositary Shares
0.315
0.264 0.85× 15% calmer State Commercial Banks
CIG Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS American Depositary Shares
0.306
0.258 0.76× 24% calmer Electric Services

Showing 13 of 13 tickers that qualified. Correlation is of daily returns; 1.000 would mean moving in lockstep, 0.000 no relationship at all.

What this is for

Three questions, one number behind all of them.

How to read the two correlation columns

The one-year figure is what the relationship looks like now. The three-year figure is what it has looked like over a longer stretch. Comparing them is the point: when they agree, the relationship is structural and likely to hold. When the one-year number is far below the three-year one, something has changed — a shift in business mix, an index reconstitution, a sector that has stopped moving together — and the recent figure is the one to trust less, not more.

Correlation measures whether two things move together, not whether they move by the same amount. That is why the volatility column is there. Two tickers can correlate at 0.99 while one swings half again as hard, and swapping one for the other would quietly change how much risk you are carrying.

What was deliberately left out

Ranking purely by correlation produces answers that are mathematically perfect and practically useless. The closest matches to AAPL by raw correlation are leveraged AAPL funds at 0.999 — correct, and not replacements for anything. Four filters run before a ticker is allowed to appear:

Where all of that leaves a ticker with no close match, the page says so. A stock with no substitute is a real and useful finding, and inventing a loose one to fill the table would be worse than an empty answer.

Limits, stated up front

Where the numbers come from

Correlations are computed in-house from a daily price history and rebuilt every night. What gets published is the derived statistic — a correlation coefficient, a volatility ratio, an observation count — and nothing from which a price or return series could be reconstructed. The rest of the Markets section is on the Markets overview, including futures positioning extremes and SEC Form 4 insider transactions.